Contact info
Long-term value for all customers
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadi pscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidun omni sum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadi pscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidun omni sum.
Your child’s brain doesn’t develop randomly—it builds itself in a sequence, starting from the deepest foundations and working outward. Sensory and safety circuits wire first (pregnancy through infancy), then movement and emotional bonds, then language and social connection, and finally self-control and planning. When you understand this sequence, you stop guessing which activities matter and start focusing on what actually builds the circuits your child’s brain is ready for right now.
Every child’s brain follows the same blueprint, but builds at its own pace—some walk at 10 months, others at 15 months, and both are perfectly normal. Research shows massive variation in when children hit milestones (first words can appear anywhere from 8 to 18 months), and this variation doesn’t predict later ability. Neurofrog tailors guidance to your child’s current pattern of strengths and emerging skills, not rigid age rules, because one-size-fits-all plans ignore how individual brains actually develop.
The brain mechanisms that build healthy development—responsive caregiving, consistent safety, rich language exposure—are universal across all cultures. But how families express these mechanisms varies beautifully: some cultures prioritize verbal mind-mindedness, others prioritize physical proximity and guidance, and children thrive with both. Neurofrog honors your family’s values and practices, because what matters is that your child feels attuned to, safe, and engaged—not that you follow a single “Western” parenting script.
PARENT OUTCOMES
Across dozens of randomized trials and meta-analyses, parents who participate in evidence-based early-years programs consistently report moderate-to-large increases in confidence and sense of competence—often within just weeks. Research also documents meaningful reductions in parenting stress and improvements in the quality of warm, responsive “serve-and-return” interactions—the back-and-forth exchanges that build children’s brains.
What the research shows:
Confidence gains: Effect sizes 0.44–0.61 across meta-analyses of 60+ studies
Stress reduction: Moderate-to-large decreases (effect sizes -0.4 to -0.5)
Interaction quality: Measurable improvements in responsive turn-taking and attunement within 8 weeks
Key findings:
Lundahl et al., 2006, Clinical Psychology Review
Meta-analysis of 63 parent training studies (1,584 citations)
Neville et al., 2013, PNAS
Family-based neuroscience training (455 citations)
Backhaus et al., 2023, Lancet EClinicalMedicine
Meta-analysis of 94 trials (70 citations)
Incredible Years Parents & Babies, 2015
RCT with infants ages 0-1
CHILD DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES
Meta-analyses of over 100 randomized controlled trials across 33 countries show significant, measurable gains in children’s cognitive, language, and motor development during the first three years of life when caregivers receive structured, brain-based support. Effect sizes of 0.21–0.44 standard deviations translate to children moving from the 50th percentile to approximately the 58th–67th percentile on developmental assessments by age 3.
Programs that explicitly teach responsive caregiving—helping parents attune to their child’s signals and engage in serve-and-return interactions—show nearly 4 times greater impact on parenting practices than programs without this focus.
What the research shows:
Cognitive development: Effect sizes 0.32–0.44 standard deviations
Language development: Effect sizes 0.31–0.33 standard deviations
Motor development: Effect sizes 0.21–0.27 standard deviations
Social-emotional: Effect sizes 0.17–0.22 (varies more across contexts; measurement challenges due to cultural differences)
Responsive caregiving advantage: Programs WITH responsive caregiving content show 4× greater effect on parenting practices (SMD=0.42 vs. 0.11)
Key findings:
Jeong et al., 2021, PLOS Medicine
102 RCTs, 33 countries, ages 0–3 (1,003 citations)
Zhang et al., 2021, PMC
Low- and middle-income countries, ages 0–2
Hirve et al., 2023, BMJ Archives of Disease in Childhood
42 RCTs, ages 0–36 months (24 citations)
WHO Nurturing Care Framework, 2018
Global evidence synthesis (261 citations)
EDUCATOR & CLASSROOM OUTCOMES
Early childhood and K-12 educators who engage with neuroscience-based professional learning show significant gains in their understanding of how children’s brains develop and learn. Teachers report increased confidence in supporting children’s cognitive and emotional growth, and independent classroom observations document meaningful improvements in teaching quality—particularly in promoting inquiry, deeper thinking, and responsive teacher-child interactions.
While direct evidence for child developmental outcomes (e.g., executive function, school readiness) from neuroscience-focused professional learning is still emerging, educators consistently report feeling more capable, less overwhelmed, and better equipped to create brain-building environments for children.
What the research shows:
Educator knowledge: Significant pre- to post-training gains (e.g., 52% → 78% correct on neuroscience assessments)
Educator confidence: Sustained increases in self-efficacy for instructional strategies and classroom management; teachers report understanding their role in “building children’s brains”
Classroom quality: Large improvements in inquiry-based teaching, depth of student thinking, substantive conversations, and teacher-child interactions (effect sizes 0.7–1.8 compared to control classrooms)
Educator well-being: Teachers report feeling more capable and better able to manage stress when they understand brain development principles
Child engagement: Students show increased interest in learning, higher participation in inquiry activities, and stronger sense of their own agency in learning
Key findings:
Dubinsky et al., 2013, Educational Researcher
BrainU workshops with 107 teachers (298 citations)
Walsh et al., 2024, Educational Research Review
Scoping review of 15 neuroscience-based professional learning programs for early childhood educators (19 citations)
Ribeiro et al., 2025, European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education
Survey of 1,120 Brazilian teachers
Williams et al., 2025, PMC
Survey of 524 Australian early childhood educators
